Cohort
Performance Analysis (PACT 1999 matched with
PACT 2000) |
| Total regular students tested in PACT 2000 |
554 |
| Number of students with PACT 1999 and PACT
2000 at HMS |
302 |
|
|
| English/Language
Arts |
| Total students with PACT 1999 and 2000 in
E/LA at HMS |
302 |
| From these 302 students: |
|
| 70 students or 23.2% |
improved one performance category
(from Below Basic to Basic, from Basic to Proficient, or from Proficient to Advanced). |
| 1 student or 0.3% |
improved two performance
categories
(from Below Basic to Proficient or from
Basic to Advanced). |
| 0 students or 0.0% |
improved three performance
categories
(from Below Basic to Advanced) |
| 199 students or 65.9% |
remained in the same performance
category. |
|
From these 199 students that
remained in the same category: |
|
43 students
or 21.6% |
were in Below Basic and
remained in Below Basic. |
|
80 students
or 40.2% |
were in Basic and remained
in Basic. |
|
72 students
or 36.2% |
were in Proficient and
remained in proficient. |
|
4 students or
2.0% |
were in Advanced and
remained in Advanced. |
| 31 students or 10.3% |
decreased one performance category
from Advanced to Proficient, from
Proficient to Basic or from Basic to
Below Basic). |
| 0 students or 0.0% |
decreased two performance
categories
(from Advanced to Basic or from
Proficient to Below Basic). |
| 1 student or 0.3% |
decreased three performance
categories
(from Advanced to Below Basic). |
| Therefore: |
23.5%
of HMS students improved performance -10.6% of HMS students decreased performance =
|
|
|
12.9% Real
improvement in
English/Language Arts |
| Comparative
View Among Middle Schools: Cohorts Performance in E/LA |
| HMS Improvement
in English/Language Arts: |
Middle School
Average Improvement in
English/Language Arts: |
| 12.9% |
9.3% |
| Math |
| Total Students with PACT 1999
and 2000 in Math at HMS |
402 |
| From these 402 students: |
|
| 72 students or 17.9% |
improved one performance category
(from Below Basic to Basic, from Basic to Proficient, or from Proficient to Advanced). |
| 4 students or 1.0 % |
improved two performance
categories
(from Below Basic to Proficient or from
Basic to Advanced). |
| 0 students or 0.0% |
improved three performance
categories
(from Below Basic to Advanced) |
| 203 students or 50.5% |
remained in the same performance
category |
|
From these 203 students that
remained
in the same category |
|
67 students or 33.0% |
were in Below Basic and
remained in Below Basic |
|
89 students or 43.8% |
were in Basic and remained
in Basic |
|
29 students or 14.3% |
were in Proficient and
remained in Proficient |
|
18 students or 8.9% |
were in Advanced and
remained in Advanced |
| 22 students or 5.5% |
decreased one performance category
(from Advanced to Proficient, from
Proficient to Basic or from Basic to
Below Basic). |
| 1 student or 0.2% |
decreased two performance
categories
(from Advanced to Basic or from
Proficient to Below Basic). |
| 0 students or 0.0% |
decreased three performance
categories
(from Advanced to Basic) |
| Therefore |
18.9% improved performance -
5.7% decreased performance = |
|
13.2% Real Improvement in Math |
Comparative
View among Middle Schools: Cohorts Performance in Math |
| HMS Improvement in Math |
Middle School Average
Improvement in Math |
13.2% |
12.0% |
|
Hillcrest Middle School Online
