HOME | Departments | Educational Technology Services | School Web Site Evaluation
School Web Site Evaluation
District Web Policy Guide
Acceptable Use Policy
Accessibility Guidelines
Web Privacy Policy
Web Copyright Policy
Copyright Practices Guidelines
School Web Site Evaluation Checklist

Web Site Evaluation Checklist

This School Website Evaluation is designed to be a self-assessment tool for schools to use to assess their individual school website.

These evaluation standards have been developed from a review of the best K-12 school websites on the Internet. To use this rubric, assign a score for each category, and then add the scores.

 

Site Content

Score
0 - 5 6 - 12 13 - 20  
  • Site does not present a "picture" of the school.
  • No content of school activities or pictures are present
  • No mission or philosophy statement is present
  • No school history is present
  • No principal statement is present;
  • School or student handbook not present
  • School activities, mission or philosophy statement included
  • Principal's statement included
  • Handbook, or history may be present, but not comprehensive
  • Site presents a fair picture of the school
  • Site is content 'rich'
  • School/student activities, mission or philosophy statement included
  • Handbook included
  • History and principal's statement are all present and current
  • A clear picture of school life is evident
  • Links to Community Resources
 

Design

Score
0 - 5 6 - 10 11 - 15  
  • Pages do not show evidence of overall design or layout
  • Graphics and logos are poor quality
  • Text is difficult to read
  • Page design changes throughout the site
  • Graphics are excessive and distracting
  • Page show some evidence of overall design or layout
  • Consistent use of colors, backgrounds, fonts, or icons
  • Graphics are mostly of good quality
  • Text is mostly legible but not entirely consistent.
  • Pages show clear evidence of overall design themes
  • Graphics are of high quality and fast to load
  • Text is easy to read in all instances.
 

Navigation

Score
0 - 3 4 - 6 7 - 10  
  • Navigation is missing or inconsistent
  • Different methods of navigation are used
  • User feels lost or stranded; buttons or links do not act predictably
  • User must use "Back" or "Go" buttons in browser to navigate
  • Frames (if used) are not targeted correctly and create confusion
  • No link to district home page
  • Buttons and text links usually work predictably
  • Some inconsistency with navigation conventions
  • User might need to resort to browser controls for navigation in some cases
  • Frames (if used) are mostly consistent but do not contribute to navigation and user experience
  • Link to school / district home page is present but may not be used consistently throughout site
  • Navigation is consistent
  • Buttons and links work predictably
  • Navigation conventions are clear
  • User is never lost or stranded
  • Frames (if used) are targeted correctly and aid in navigation and user experience
  • Main links are repeated at the bottom of every page
  • Links to district home page are present and consistently used throughout site
 

Timeliness

Score
0 - 3 4 - 6 7 - 10  
  • Pages are rarely updated
  • Old projects are presented as new or current
  • E-mail addresses or home pages of staff no longer at the school are present
  • Published dates for upcoming projects are already past
  • Pages with "under construction" messages are common and not updated
  • Pages are updated infrequently
  • Some "under construction" messages persist
  • E-mail and home page addresses are mostly current
  • Some project dates are past
  • Teachers identified in a specific grade /subject /department may have moved to another
  • Pages are updated regularly
  • Material is dated correctly
  • E-mail addresses or home pages for staff are current
  • Ongoing projects are truly current
  • No "under construction" messages
 

Parents

Score
0 - 3 4 - 6 7 - 10  
  • No Parents section is present
  • Parents section  is not current and does not provide methods for parental input or contact
  • Links to sites for parents are not present
  • Parents section is present but does not include information about ongoing projects
  • Minimal parental input options are present (e.g., phone numbers)
  • Newsletter is not published consistently
  • PTA / SIC represented
  • Some links to parent sites are present
  • Parents section is current
  • Parental involvement is encouraged with multiple methods for input (e.g., phone, e-mail, suggestion box form, bulletin board, etc.)
  • Ongoing projects are listed
  • Newsletter is published consistently
  • PTA / SIC pages present and complete
  • Links to parent sites are present.
 

School Calendar

Score
0 - 3 4 - 6 7 - 10  
  • No school activity calendars are present
  • Activity calendars are out of date
  • School activity calendar is present but links to district calendars are not
  • Activity calendars are mostly up to date but may omit some events
  • School activity calendars are always up to date and reliable
  • They are updated frequently
  • Links are provided to district and other calendars
 

Staff Directory

Score
0 - 3 4 - 6 7 - 10  
  • No staff directory is present
  • Staff directory does not provide ways to contact staff (e.g., e-mail, phone).
  • Staff directory is present but not always current
  • Does not include all staff members
  • Contact information is mostly provided
  • Staff directory is current and lists all staff, including itinerant staff
  • Contact information is complete
 

Student Work

Score
0 - 3 4 - 6 7 - 10  
  • Few, if any, student projects are published
  • Projects are limited to basic home pages
  • Projects show limited editing or proofing
  • Some student work is present
  • Teacher-created information about student projects (rather than actual student work) predominates
  • Student projects are limited to only a few classes or individuals (e.g., only a few teachers or classes are involved)
  • Some ongoing projects (such as literary magazines) are present
  • Projects show some evidence of editing and proofing
  • Student projects are a significant feature
  • Projects are from a variety of classes, levels, or individuals
  • Projects feature original student work, including drawings, writing, photographs, videos, etc.
  • Projects are related to curriculum
  • Ongoing projects are present
  • Projects show strong evidence of editing and proofing
 

Legal/Guidelines

Score
0 - 1 2 - 3 4 - 5  
  • Copyrighted images are used without permission
  • Pages do not comply with district guidelines
  • Copyrighted images are used with permission but not always clearly credited
  • Pages mostly comply with district guidelines
  • Copyrighted images are used with permission and clearly credited
  • All pages comply with district guidelines
 

Total

 

Download Printable Version